Legal Opinion

Jacob v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 27, 1988No. 85-0557; CA A43950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Plaintiffs appeal a summary judgment for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oregon (Blue Cross) in this action for breach of a health insurance contract. The trial court granted the judgment on the basis that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that, as a matter of law, the claimed treatment and related expenses are not covered under the insurance contract. We affirm.

Plaintiff father had a health insurance contract with Blue Cross. His son, San, contracted cancer. Blue Cross paid benefits for conventional treatment of the disease. However, it denied reimbursement for “Gerson therapy,”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Best v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bahler v. FletcherOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Mortgage Bancorporation v. New Hampshire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Pietila v. 2081 FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Northwest Laundry and Dry Cleaners Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Stanislaw R. BurzynskiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. CityWide Social Work & Psychological Services, P.L.L.C. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2004
  3. Welker Ex Rel. Bradbury v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Welker Ex Rel. Bradbury v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API