Legal Opinion

Prejean v. Real Superstore

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1988No. 88-85PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOTION TO DISMISS

FORET, Judge.

Defendant-appellee, National Tea Company, moves to dismiss the appeal of plaintiff-appellant, Elsie Prejean, on the grounds that the judgment appealed from is a non-appealable interlocutory judgment.

The trial court rendered judgment against the plaintiff compelling her to answer the interrogatories propounded to her by defendant within fifteen (15) days and assessing her with attorney’s fees in the sum of $150 for the cost to defendant in bringing the Motion to Compel.

As this court stated in Lyman v. Town of Sunset, 453 So.2d 672 (La.App. 3 Cir.1984):

“An appeal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roy v. MoityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Keaty v. Furlow, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Lyman v. Town of SunsetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Hornsby and LandryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Succession of PauliLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API