Legal Opinion

Reys v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 14, 1903No. 2755PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Ho statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HEHDEBSOH, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of rape, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of fifteen years, and prosecutes this appeal..

What purports to be a statement of facts does not appear to have been approved by the trial judge, and consequently can not be considered. Appellant assigns as error the action of the court refusing to quash the indictment. His first contention is that the indictment is fatally defective because it alleges the offense to have been committed in “Guadlufe” and not Gaudalupe county; that there is no such county in this State,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lyles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  2. Meyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Leaks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Zulkowsky v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API