Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Charles Wright v. Turan-Foley Motors, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Decided January 23, 2018No. 2016–WC–01264–COAPublished
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CARLTON, J., CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART:
¶ 50. Finding that the Commission and the AJ erroneously admitted the unresponsive defense expert witness deposition testimony of Dr. Vohra in violation of its own rules, I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part with the majority. The Commission should follow its own procedural rules in conducting its duties of administering workers' compensation claims and should not admit evidence in contravention to those rules when to do so thwarts due process. See Pulliam v. Miss. State Hudspeth Reg'l Ctr. , 147 So.3d 864 , 869-71 (¶¶ 18-25)…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bowie v. Montfort Jones Memorial Hosp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Thompson MacHinery Commerce v. WallaceMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Upchurch Plumbing, Inc. v. Greenwood Utilities CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. LumpkinMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Rathborne, Hair & Ridgeway Box Co. v. GreenMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.