Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Haskell v. Drew

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 8, 1918No. 8603PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; H. C. Thurman, Judge. Action by George Drew against the First National Bank of Haskell. Judgment for defendant, and from an order granting a new trial it brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PRYOR. C.

This is an action commenced in the superior court of Muskogee county by George Drew, defendant in error, against the First National Bank of Haskell, to recover usurious interest paid. The action is brought under the United States usury statute. The action was commenced on the 2d day of March, 1916, and the petition alleges that' the usurious interest was paid on the 2d day of March, 1914. The court, after some evidence had been introduced by the plaintiff upon the objection the defendant to the introduction of any further evidence on the ground that the petition did not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sheets v. Selden's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Credit Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Bemis v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. Best v. PolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Seward v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States Fire Ins. Co. v. SwydenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Midland Valley R. Co. v. TownesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Winn v. NilsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Evans v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Camps v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API