Legal Opinion
Luxemburg v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Pension Fund
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1977PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin B. Stecher, J.
The plaintiff is an attorney who has brought three separate actions for services rendered and on account of retainer agreements. The three actions were tried jointly.
The plaintiff entered into a retainer with each of the three affiliated organizations: the Local 11 Chain Service Restaurant & Luncheonette Union; the Trustees of the Local 11 Pension Fund; and the Trustees of the Local 11 Welfare Trust Fund. Under the terms of the agreements with the respective trustees, the plaintiff was to receive $16,000 per annum from each fund, payable $4,000 quarter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rentways, Inc. v. O'Neill Milk & Cream Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Martin v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- City of New York v. New York City Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Greenberg v. Jerome H. Remick & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Rankin v. KillionNew York Supreme Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jass v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Scholtens v. SchneiderIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Nealy v. U.S. Healthcare HMODistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Levisohn, Lerner, Berger & Langsam v. Medical Taping Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.