Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Enzo Biochem, Inc.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided April 20, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Norman C. Ryp, J.
a. ISSUE
Whether the "reasonable application” requirement of RPAPL 735 (1) incorporates the statutory mandates of "due *919diligence” of CPLR 308 (2) where corporate tenant never moves into demised premises due to asbestos removal cost issue and restricts eligible corporate representatives to be served with process in a summary proceeding to those specified in CPLR 311 (1)? A disturbing issue of first resolution!
B. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Pursuant to CPLR 2221 (a), respondent’s motions for leave to reargue and reconsider this court’s decision dated November 4, 1994,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eight Associates v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Eight Associates v. HynesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Parkchester Apartments Co. v. HawkinsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1981
- Lana Estates, Inc. v. National Energy Reduction Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- 815 Park Owners, Inc. v. West LB AdminisTration, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 91 Fifth Avenue Corp. v. Brookhill Property Holdings LLCCivil Court of the City of New York · 2016