Onomea Sugar Co. v. Austin
Hawaii Supreme Court
Appeal prom Decision oe Preston, J. The Onomea Sugar Co., having accepted a charter, and organized by election of officers and adoption of by-laws, held to be a duly and legally organized and existing corporation.
Read the full summary
Appeal prom Decision oe Preston, J. The Onomea Sugar Co., having accepted a charter, and organized by election of officers and adoption of by-laws, held to be a duly and legally organized and existing corporation. Defendants’ assignor, being the owner of all the stock in the Onomea Sugar Co., sold it to C. Brewer & Co., to cover the corporation’s debt to them, and C. Brewer & Co. agreed to sell it back to him within a year for the amount that the account stood them in, with interest; held that C. Brewer & Co. had the right to vote the stock while they held it. Officers of the corporation of…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion oe the Court, by
McCully, J.
The bill prays for an injunction. It is brought by J. O. Carter, as President of the plaintiff company. The injunction was issued by Mr. Justice Preston, to whom the bill was addressed in the first instance.
The real issues involved in this suit and another in which the several parties in interest herein are likewise concerned, are stated in the following stipulation executed by their counsel. *556Matters of fact or evidence, and points of argument necessary to to be stated, in addition to those set forth in the stipulation, will be stated in their place in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- National Bank v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States Tr. Co. of New York v. . U.S. Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Pullman v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- National Bank v. Watsontown BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.