Archambault v. Casellini-Venable Corp.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
This is an action of “justice ejectment”. LaFleur et al. v. Smith, 95 Vt 476, 477, 478, 115 A 729. Trial was by the Barre Municipal Court, findings of fact were made and filed and the plaintiff had a judgment below to which the defendant excepted and the case is here upon this and various other exceptions saved and briefed by the defendant.
The plaintiff bases his alleged right to maintain this suit on two grounds: first, that the lease under which the defendant occupied certain premises in Barre had been terminated by a notice sent to the defendant by the plaintiff in accordance with the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mancini v. ThomasSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re SageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1949
- Vermont Small Business Development Corp. v. Fifth Son Corp., Henzel, Mad Partners, LLC and PiersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Central Cab, Inc. v. IronsideSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Christos Panagiotidis and Hrisanthi Panagiotidis v. Alexander GalanisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Deschenes v. CongelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988