Legal Opinion

City of West Sacramento v. R & L Business Management

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 2, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00900Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, No. 2:18-cv-00900 WBS EFB CALIFORNIA; and PEOPLE OF THE 13 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 14 Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 15 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THEIR CLAIMS UNDER THE GATTO ACT 16 R AND L BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, a AND THE HSAA California corporation, f/k/a 17 STOCKTON PLATING, INC., d/b/a CAPITOL PLATING INC., a/k/a 18 CAPITOL PLATING, a/k/a CAPITAL PLATING; CAPITOL PLATING, INC., 19 a dissolved California corporation; et al., 20 Defendants. 21 22…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API