Legal Opinion

Afshari Enterprises, Inc. v. Venz

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1985No. 49118PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Plaintiff Afshari Enterprises, Inc. sued defendant Samuel B. Steimel and Barry Venz for rent due under a lease agreement. After Steimel failed to answer timely plaintiff’s Request for Admissions and Interrogatories the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against Steimel only. Plaintiff’s same cause of action against Venz remains pending in the trial court. Likewise cross-claims by Venz against Steimel and a third party petition of Venz against Richard Cherry for indemnification and separate cross-claims by Steimel and Cherry against Venz for fraud and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies v. C.F. Murphy & Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Payan ex rel. Payan v. HeiseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Willman v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Thomas v. M---R---AMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Markham v. MedlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Shoots v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Sinopole v. MorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API