Legal Opinion

Bell v. Potter

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 12, 2002No. CIV.A. 00-10054-RBCPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ (SIC) MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL (# 84)

COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On June 4, 2002, following a six-day trial the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff Candy Bell (“Bell” or “plaintiff’) on her Title VII retaliation claim as against the defendant John E. Potter, in his official capacity as Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service (“Potter” or “defendant”). Ten days later on June 14, 2002, the defendant filed his renewed motion for judgment as a matter of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API