State v. Hollis

GAUDIN, Judge.

This is an appeal pursuant to State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La.1976).

Kelly Hollis complains because (1) the trial judge did not grant his motion to suppress evidence and (2) an illegal fine and probation fee were imposed. He states that he is and was indigent.

For the following reasons, we affirm the trial judge’s denial of Hollis’ motion to suppress the narcotic evidence and reverse that part of the sentence requiring the payment of a fine and fee as special conditions of probation.

Hollis was passed out on a public sidewalk at 5:25 a.m. when first observed by police officer…