Legal Opinion

Hill v. Douglass

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 20, 1971No. O-11PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

248 So.2d 182 (1971)

Edward J. HILL, Appellant,

v.

W. Dexter DOUGLASS, Appellee.

No. O-11.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 20, 1971.

Truett & Watkins, Tallahassee, for appellant.

W.K. Whitfield and Carl R. Pennington, Jr., Tallahassee, for appellee.

RAWLS, Judge.

Appellant Hill (plaintiff below) has appealed a final judgment wherein the trial judge decided that Canon 19 of the Canons of Professional Ethics, 32 F.S.A. precluded Hill from sharing in a legal fee. By this appeal appellant primarily contends that Canon 19 does not bar payment for professional services rendered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dudley v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. Millican v. HunterSupreme Court of Florida · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arcara v. PHILIP M. WARREN, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Beavers v. ConnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. ALLIEDSIGNAL RECOVERY v. AlliedSignal, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Hill v. DouglassSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  5. Omni Developments, Inc. v. PorterDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API