Hough v. Leonard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
HODGES, Chief Justice,
with whom SIMMS, J., joins, concurring in part and dissenting in part:
I respectfully dissent to the majority’s resolution of the issue of jurisdiction.
As to the issue of jurisdiction, in Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 78 S.Ct. 1228, 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1958), at page 253, 78 S.Ct. at pages 1239-40 the United States Supreme Court set out the following rule:
The unilateral activity of those who claim some relationship with a nonresident defendant cannot satisfy the requirement of contact with the forum State. The application of that rule will vary with the quality and nature…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.