Legal Opinion

In re Sarama

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 24, 2011No. 2011-B-1072Published

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent failed to promptly remit funds owed to a third-party medical provider. Respondent subsequently failed to cooperate with the ODC in its investigation of the complaint filed against him. This misconduct occurred in the same time frame as the misconduct forming the basis of respondent’s earlier disciplinary matters. Prior to the filing of new formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re SaramaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API