Federal Trade Commission v. Noland, Jr.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
Case 2:20-cv-00047-DWL Document 579 Filed 05/11/23 Page 1 of 131 1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Federal Trade Commission, No. CV-20-00047-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 James D. Noland, Jr., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 The bench trial in this matter took place over the course of 11 trial days in January 16 and February 2023. The Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are set forth below. 17 LEGAL STANDARD 18 Rule 52(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[i]n an action 19 tried on the facts without a…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.