Legal Opinion

Fkanklin Mining Co. v. O'Brien

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1896PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The appellee O’Brien, who was plaintiff below, is the owner of an undivided one fifth of the Franklin mining claim; the appellant, The Franklin Mining Company, the defendant below, is the owner of the remaining undivided four fifths thereof, the sole owner of the Dr. Franklin mining claim, and the owner of an undivided one half of the Steele mining claim, all situate in the Aspen mining district, Colorado.

The complaint in this case contains two causes of action, but as plaintiff bases his rights upon the second and upon his replication, the first cause of action, which is in the ordinary form…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Van Horne v. FondaNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
  2. Turner v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Roberts v. ThornTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Rippetoe v. DwyerTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Venable v. BeauchampCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mills v. HartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  2. Stevens v. Grand Central Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. Van Wagenen v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  4. Wofford v. WoffordSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Cedar Canyon Consolidated Mining Co. v. YarwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API