Legal Opinion

Grady Monroe Holsen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1968No. 24312PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant and Joseph McConnell were jointly indicted and separately tried for violations of the federal narcotics laws. 1 Appellant was convicted on a jury verdict of conspiring to sell narcotics not in the original stamped package and without a written order. We affirm.

Appellant’s contention that the District Court erred in not requiring McConnell to testify in appellant’s behalf is without merit. McConnell was a co-defendant who was then in the process of appealing his conviction. He did not waive his fifth amendment privilege and could not therefore be made to testify. 8 Wigmore, Evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. J. Adams Bruce, as President of Bruce's Juices, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. J. T. Lott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. United States v. Hurley SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. William Edward Klein, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. James Williamson, and Jack WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Dunham Concrete Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Ellison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API