Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. McCanless
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKihney
By the bill complainant questions the validity of Chapter 126', Public Acts of 1941, which amended the second paragraph of Section 6 of the Tobacco Tax Law, Pub. Acts 1937, ch. 133, to read as follows:
‘ ‘ The Commissioner is empowered to allow any wholesale dealer and jobber, as hereinaftér defined, a discount of an amount not to exceed Seven and One-half (714%) Per Cent of the value of the stamps as compensation for selling and affixing the stamps to tobacco products. For the purpose of this paragraph, the term ‘wholesale dealer and jobber’ is hereby defined to mean persons, firms or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Condon v. MaloneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- Cole Manufacturing Co. v. FallsTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- Spur Distributing Co. v. LindseyTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- Helms v. Tennessee Department of SafetyTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Carroll v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- White Stores, Inc. v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Pueblo v. PullaroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Helms v. Dept. of SafetyTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.