Legal Opinion

People v. Clobridge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1930No. Docket No. 152, Calendar No. 34,482Published

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant was charged in the information filed against him with having violated Act No. 123, Pub. Acts 1913; 1 Comp. Laws 1915, §§ 5037-5040. An order granting defendant's motion to quash is reviewed by the people by writ of error.

A child was born at 3 o'clock a. m. November 10, 1928. No physician was present. The child's father tried to secure the services of defendant, a regular practicing physician, but defendant was busy and could not then respond. He did, however, visit the mother and child eight hours after the child's birth, but did not treat the child's eyes with a prophylaxis named…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Zacharias v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Rohde v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Crosby v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Van Camp v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Van Buren v. WylieMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API