Williams, Administrator v. Lauderdale
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentMcFaddin, J.
The majority holding is not based on, and does not discuss, the issue of conscious pain and suffering; so I, likewise, forego any discussion of that question, although it was the basis of the decision in the trial court.
The majority opinion upholds the verdict, directed for the defendants, on the ground that there was no evidence that the fire was caused by the defective wiring. I respectfully dissent, because I believe there was sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury on this issue.
The rule governing lower courts in directing a verdict for the defendant is stated in New York…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Saint Louis-San Francisco Rd. Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Hays v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- New York Underwriters' Insurance v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935