Day v. Mertlock
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Monroe County. Action for a trespass to real property. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtOrton, C. J.
This is an appeal from an order setting aside the judgment rendered in this case, and permitting *579the defendant to serve an answer herein within twenty days.
The summons, with the venue laid in circuit court, “ La Crosse county,” was served September 12, 1892. Notice of retainer by Messrs. Morrow & Masters, attorneys for the defendant, served September 21st, and a copy of the complaint demanded. Due service of the complaint admitted by said attorneys October 7th. The complaint returned October 8th, with the following indorsement thereon: “The within complaint is returned, for the reason that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ætna Life Insurance v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
- Salter v. HilgenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Johnson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Hoppe v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Scheer v. KeownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bassett v. BassettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Omark-Prentice Hydraulics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
- Bloor v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Superior Consolidated Land Co. v. DunphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Velte v. ZehWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.