Legal Opinion

Newman v. McComb

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 8, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Orange county in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

This is an action of assumpsit, based upon two writings, one of which is as follows:

“N. Y. Supreme Court, Kings county.
“Lelia Moore Newman, plaintiff,

v.

Walter George Newman, defendant.

“Whereas the plaintiff has brought the above entitled action against the defendant for an absolute divorce, and said action is now pending in the court above named; and
“Whereas, it is mutually desired that no application should at present be made in open court for an allowance of alimony and counsel fee;
“Now, therefore, it is stipulated and agreed between the plaintiff and. defendant, and by and between their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. DashielSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barnes v. American Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
  2. Gloth v. GlothSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  3. Buchanan v. BuchananSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  4. Wallihan v. HughesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  5. Moore v. CrutchfieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API