Legal Opinion

DiAmico v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1973No. Appeal, No. 856 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

This is an appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying Claimant-Appellant benefits.

Appellant was employed by Henkel & McCoy, Inc., as a ditch digger and truck driver for six years. On Saturday, October 30, 1971, Appellant injured his back in an accident at his home, and did not report to work until the following Wednesday, which was November 3, 1971, when he was discharged for failing to report his inability to work. This was a violation of an established house rule.

Appellant filed a claim for unemployment compensation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harmer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Curran Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Sturniolo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. WaltonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Chambers v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Warminster Fiberglass Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API