Legal Opinion

United States v. Philip Michael, II

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 20, 2018No. 17-5626PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

What does it mean to "use[ ]" someone else's "means of identification"? 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1). The question arises in the context of an indictment alleging that Philip Michael used a doctor's means of identification (his name and identification number) and a patient's means of identification (his name and birth date) to request insurance reimbursement for a drug the doctor never prescribed and the patient never requested. Michael claims that the statute covers only impersonations, and he never impersonated anyone. Even if he fraudulently used a doctor's identification…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  2. Dubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  3. United States v. WeddCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Karen GagarinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Simon HongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API