United States v. Philip Michael, II
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
What does it mean to "use[ ]" someone else's "means of identification"? 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1). The question arises in the context of an indictment alleging that Philip Michael used a doctor's means of identification (his name and identification number) and a patient's means of identification (his name and birth date) to request insurance reimbursement for a drug the doctor never prescribed and the patient never requested. Michael claims that the statute covers only impersonations, and he never impersonated anyone. Even if he fraudulently used a doctor's identification…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Dubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- United States v. WeddCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Karen GagarinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Simon HongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.