Legal Opinion
Midland Enterprises, Inc. v. Notre Dame Fleeting & Towing Service, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided September 25, 1975No. 74-164A(3)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WANGELIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for a decision on the merits. The case was tried to the Court sitting without a jury pursuant to normal admiralty procedure. The Court being fully apprised of the premises hereby makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Findings of Fact
1. The plaintiff, Midland Enterprises, Inc., (hereinafter Midland) is a corporation organized according to law and was the owner of Barge OR328. The plaintiff, The Ohio River Company, (hereinafter Ohio River) was a corporation under law, and was the charterer and operator of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Punt Sisung and Gus Fitzgerald v. Tiger Pass Shipyard Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Gelb v. Minneford Yacht Yard, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Martin Marietta Corporation v. PETER KIEWIT SONS'CO.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Universal Towing Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1972
3Cited by1 opinion
- Midland Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, and the Ohio River Company, a Corporation v. Notre Dame Fleeting & Towing Service, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976