Murley, Conklin v. State

Appellants were charged with possessing gambling devices, known as pinball machines, which machines were alleged to be equipped with automatic recording devices providing the right to replay in violation of Burns’ Indiana Statutes §10-2332 (1956 Replacement) , 1 The causes were consolidated together for trial and appellants were tried by a jury resulting in their conviction. They were each fined in the sum of $500.00 and appeal from the judgment.

Appellants contend the court erred in overruling their motion in arrest of judgment on the alleged grounds of the motion that (1) the facts stated in…