Legal Opinion

Adams v. Washita ConserVancy Dist. No. 1.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 27, 1928No. 18356PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERR, C.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Garvin county denying a motion to vacate its decree organizing the Washita Conservancy District. This district was organized under authority of chapter 139, Session Laws 1923-4, the purpose of its organization being to drain overflow lands lying in Garvin and McLain counties.

The decree is challenged on nine different grounds. The first, misnomer; fourth, conditions did not exist as alleged in the petition; fifth, petition was not filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court; and, sixth, the decree was obtained by fraud; all of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coyle v. Board of Com'rs of Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Mulligan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Board of Com'rs. of Rogers Co. v. LipeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Mayes-Rogers Counties Conservancy Dist. FormationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Welker v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API