Bailey v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The question treated by the Court of Appeals relates to that feature of the record showing that the judgment was amended by the circuit court nunc pro tunc after the appeal from the judgment of conviction reached the Court of Appeals. The appeal being on the record without a report of the trial, the question was the sufficiency of the judgment of conviction. That judgment was defective. In response to a certiorari the circuit court amended the judgment to remedy the defect and the record in that proceeding' was certified to the Court of Appeals. There was an affirmance upon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Town of Camden v. BlochSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Home Ins. Co. v. ShrinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Lewis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
- Ex Parte CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Youngblood v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Johnson v. BryarsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Ex Parte BiddleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Pinkard v. HastingsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963