Ayer v. Robinson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
The present action is against E. W. Robinson and his son, Ray Robinson, for damages for assault. Defendants filed a joint answer, in which Ray Robinson admitted striking plaintiff, but alleged as an affirmative defense to the action that he did so in self-defense. It was also alleged as a defense that any violence committed by defendants was provoked by plaintiff’s vile and abusive language, and by his unlawful “interference” with E. W. Robinson. After an extended trial, the court made findings and entered judgment in favor of plaintiff and against both defendants for $8,500 compensatory…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Turner v. WhittelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Fischer v. OstbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Herman v. GlasscockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Boyajian v. BalianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by8 opinions
- Susag v. City of Lake ForestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Knapps v. City of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Arpin v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Rael v. CadenaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Crocker Citizens National Bank v. KnappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.