Legal Opinion
Urgo v. Coles & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 21, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.
These are concurrent actions by infant and parent, the former for personal injuries and the latter the usual parent’s action in such cases. They were tried together, and from directed verdicts for the defendant the plaintiffs appeal.
On the afternoon of February 5, 1927, the infant plaintiff, then in the employ of Mansfield & Co., Inc., was operating a freight elevator which fell and caused him serious injury. The defendant was the lessee of the entire building located in the borough of Manhattan. Mansfield & Co., Inc., was a subtenant of the defendant of the fourth floor of the building. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Stewart v. . FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Gombert v. . McKayNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Goetz v. . DuffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Smith v. Variety Iron & Steel Works Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Duncan v. Twin Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954