Legal Opinion

In Re Luria

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 13, 1994No. 18-25698PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DUNCAN W. KEIR, Bankruptcy Judge.

This court has before it a Motion To Prohibit The Use Of Cash Collateral filed by Crestar and the Debtor’s Response thereto. Both parties have submitted supplemental memoranda which this court also has considered. At the preliminary hearing, Crestar’s motion was denied due to insufficient evidence upon which this court could find that the funds at issue were Crestar’s cash collateral. In addition to the cash collateral motion, Crestar has asked this court to determine whether the funds, derived from a Personal Services Consulting Agreement,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. In Re CarsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
  4. In Re FitzSimmonsUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Andrews v. Hall (In Re Andrews)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Snow v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (In Re Snow)District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
  2. Maryland v. Antonelli Creditors' Liquidating TrustDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API