Legal Opinion

Daeges v. Beh

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 12, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

De Graee, J.-

— This action involves a recovery of damages for the breach of an alleged contract. The primary question to be determined in the first instance is whether or not there was a contract. If there was no contract, then there could be no breach thereof.

It appears that the plaintiff visited the farm of the defendant, and asked the tenant on said farm if certain corn then on the farm was for sale. The tenant told the plaintiff that the com belonged to the landowner, the defendant in this case. At that time, the plaintiff said he would give Mr. Beh, the owner, 60 cents per bushel, if he…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Preston v. HowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  2. John T. Jones Construction Co. v. Hoot General Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Durst v. Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Mike Marion Niday v. Roehl Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2019
  5. State Ex Rel. Keeney v. AyersMontana Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API