Legal Opinion

Santiago v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

937 A.2d 610 (2007)

Pedro Louis SANTIAGO, Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued September 6, 2007.

Decided December 3, 2007.

Kent D. Watkins, Saint Clair, for petitioner.

Arthur R. Thomas, Asst. Counsel, Harrisburg, for respondent.

BEFORE: LEADBETTER, President Judge, and COLINS, Judge, and PELLEGRINI, Judge, and FRIEDMAN, Judge, and COHN JUBELIRER, Judge, and SIMPSON, Judge, and LEAVITT, Judge.

OPINION BY Judge PELLEGRINI.

Pedro Louis Santiago (Santiago) petitions for review from an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Nelson v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Krantz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Chalifoux v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API