Legal Opinion
Barnum v. Frickey
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified, on the facts, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Both plaintiffs (the Barnums) and defendants (the Frickeys) claim they own the same parcel of real estate bordering Lake Ontario in the Town of Sodus. The subject property consists of a wooded lot and is improved by a two-story cottage. The Barnums claim they purchased the property in September 1980 pursuant to a contract with defendant Lee Sundsted. The Frickeys claim they purchased the property in March 1981 pursuant to a contract with the defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holm v. C.M.P. Sheet Metal, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Spuches v. Royal View, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Lo Biondo v. D'AuriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Schaffer Stores Company v. Grand Union Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Maurer v. Albany Sand & Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wooten v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Ferdico v. ZweigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Blitshteyn v. MeraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Pirraglia v. Jofsen, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019