Legal Opinion
Gimbel v. Loughlin
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided April 22, 1968No. File 115540PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFitzGerald, J.
This is an appeal by four individuals, all residents of the town of Woodbridge, from a finding and order issued by the publie utilities commission on October 30, 1967, approving an application by The United Illuminating Company for permission to construct a two-circuit 115 KY electric transmission line from the site of a new substation to be constructed at June Street and Hazel Terrace in the town of Woodbridge to a connection with an existing transmission line near Pease Road in that town. The site of the substation and the plan for such a structure were approved by the Woodbridge town plan…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Borough of Roselle v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Jaffe v. State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Upper St. Clair TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Wilson Point Property Owners Assn. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- City of New Haven v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Hartford v. Public Utilities CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1973
- City of Hartford v. Public Utilities CommissionPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1973