United States v. Halsey
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKEL, District Judge.
Defendant is named in a two-count indictment charging narcotics violations. He has moved under Rule 41(e), Fed.R. Crim.P., to suppress evidence taken in the search of an apartment. Upon the testimony adduced at a hearing and the submissions of counsel, the court holds that the motion must be denied. The findings and conclusions resulting in this determination are as follows:
I
On March 10, 1966, Commissioner Bishopp issued a search warrant authorizing a search of Apartment 2F, 470 West 150th St., New York City, for “a quantity of loose heroin and bundles of heroin…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Snell v. TunnellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Dancy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Theodor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- John Kelly, Jr. v. Steven Curtis Julie M. Gibson J.R. Moore Chatham County, GaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.