Legal Opinion

United States v. Halsey

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 2, 1966No. 66 Cr 334PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKEL, District Judge.

Defendant is named in a two-count indictment charging narcotics violations. He has moved under Rule 41(e), Fed.R. Crim.P., to suppress evidence taken in the search of an apartment. Upon the testimony adduced at a hearing and the submissions of counsel, the court holds that the motion must be denied. The findings and conclusions resulting in this determination are as follows:

I

On March 10, 1966, Commissioner Bishopp issued a search warrant authorizing a search of Apartment 2F, 470 West 150th St., New York City, for “a quantity of loose heroin and bundles of heroin…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Snell v. TunnellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. Dancy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Theodor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. John Kelly, Jr. v. Steven Curtis Julie M. Gibson J.R. Moore Chatham County, GaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API