Legal Opinion
Brammer v. Martinaire, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided September 9, 1992No. 07-92-0144-CVPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYD, Justice.
Appellant Todd D. Brammer brings this appeal from a take-nothing summary judgment in favor of appellee Martinaire, Inc. The question for our decision is whether two different dates may be used to satisfy time requirements in two different sections of the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5221k (Vernon 1987) 1 [hereinafter Act].
In one point, appellant contends the trial court erred in granting its judgment because the evidence does not show appellee was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. For reasons hereinafter expressed, we disagree with that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- Perkins v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Ex Parte PruittTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Green v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Hennigan v. IP Petroleum Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Tarrant County v. VandigriffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Czerwinski v. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of NursingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Stanley Stores, Inc. v. Chavana, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
- Martinez v. IBP, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.