Legal Opinion

Central Bank of the South v. Seppala & Aho Construction Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 23, 1995No. 93-3581PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARMER, Judge.

We affirm in all respects except for the award of postjudgment interest on the prejudgment interest included in the final judgment. As to that, we reverse on the basis of our decisions in Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London v. Millar, 627 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), rev. denied, 639 So.2d 984 (Fla. 1994); and Central Constructors, Inc. v. Spectrum Contracting Co., 621 So.2d 526 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). In Millar, we said:

“we agree with Underwriters that the award to Millar erroneously includes post-judgment interest on that part of the final judgment which was prejudgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. United Services Auto. Ass'n v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. LaFaye v. PresserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Perez Sandoval v. Banco De CommercioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Central Constructors, Inc. v. Spectrum Contracting Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cadillac Fairview Corp. v. Resort at Indian Spring Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Freundlich v. LassiterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API