Legal Opinion

Korten v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 28, 1988No. 87-1049Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rizzi

Plaintiffs, Evelyn McDonnell Korten, Elaine McDonnell Solari and other beneficiaries of a trust, filed a complaint to terminate the trust by the consent of the beneficiaries. Defendant, Chicago City Bank and Trust Company, filed a motion to strike the complaint on the basis that the facts alleged in the complaint are not sufficient to allow a voluntary termination of the trust. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to strike and dismissed the case. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

On a motion to strike a complaint, the well-pleaded facts are taken as true…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heiner v. DonnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Franciscan Sisters Health Care Corp. v. DeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. MacLaughlin v. Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Bozza v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API