Legal Opinion

People v. Bell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 10, 1994No. Nos. 3—93—0653 through 3—93—0655 consPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

The defendant, Brian D. Bell, was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, failure to signal when required, disobeying a stop sign and failure to have insurance. The defendant pled guilty to the insurance offense. Prior to trial on the other charges, the defendant filed a motion in limine seeking to prohibit the State from introducing evidence that he had refused to take a blood-alcohol test. Following a hearing, the circuit court granted the defendant’s motion. The State appeals.

At the hearing on the defendant’s motion, it was undisputed that the defendant was asked to take a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. People v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API