C. G. Kershaw Contracting Co. v. Cascade Corp. of Alabama
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The bill had for its purpose the establishment and enforcement of a material and labor lien on land, or an equitable mortgage thereon for the indebtedness incurred by written contract in the improvements upon said land; the improvements consisting of a swimming pool and structure incidental thereto.
The answer of respondent was made a cross-bill, and the agreement exhibited, alleged to be void, was prayed to be canceled on the records of the probate court. And of the instrument averred to be executed by authority in the original bill, it is averred, among other things, as follows: “Respondent…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Prestwood v. CarltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Hooper v. StrahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Ledbetter & Co. v. VintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Ala. Coal Mining Co. v. BrainardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Byrum Hardware Co. v. Jenkins Bldg. Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Roth v. J. N. Roth & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Becker Roofing Co. v. HanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Hughes v. SkidmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934