Legal Opinion

Schrader v. Hoover

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 23, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Council Bluffs Superior Court. — Hon. E. E. Aylesworth, Judge. ACTION to recover for medic'al services rendered by the plaintiff to tbe defendant. There was a trial by jury, and verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, C. J.

1. Husband and wife ¡Rability for family pleading ana proof: — I. At the time the alleged medical services were rendered, the defendant was the wife of David Hoover, and it is claimed by the . . plaintiff that the services were a necessary J . , ../ expense, and chargeable to both the defendant and her husband, and that they are jointly ana severally liable therefor. The defendant answered the petition by a general denial. The evidence shows that the plaintiff is a physician and surgeon who resides at Iowa City in this state; and that the defendant, who resides at Walnut in this state, was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smedley v. FeltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  2. Marquardt v. FlaugherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Murdy v. SkylesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Kelley v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Neasham v. McNairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Dodd v. St. JohnOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Sager v. RiskSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API