Legal Opinion

Storey Construction Inc. v. Hanks

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2009No. 35459-2008PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order permanently enjoining arbitration regarding a construction contract on the ground that the claims alleged in the arbitration were barred by res judicata. The party seeking arbitration had asserted a counterclaim for construction defects in a prior arbitration and that counterclaim had been denied by the arbitrators. The district court held that the award barred all future claims for construction defects, even if they were unknown at the time of the prior arbitration and could not reasonably have been discovered. Because that holding is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Ticor Title Co. v. StanionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bingham County Commission v. Interstate Electric Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Waterfront Marine Construction, Inc. v. North End 49ers Sandbridge Bulkhead Groups A, B and CSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  5. Wolfe v. Farm Bureau InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. AED, Inc. v. KDC Investments, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Idaho Transportation Department v. Ascorp, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Wattenbarger v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Syringa Networks, LLC v. Idaho Department of AdministrationIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Mickelsen Construction, Inc. v. HorrocksIdaho Supreme Court · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API