Legal Opinion

Kibbee v. Lyons

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for an injunction restraining the defendants, comprising the canal board of the state of New York, from abandoning six and five-tenths miles, comprising sections 1 and 2, of the Erie canal.

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

The Erie canal commenced at lock No. 1 in the city of Albany at its junction with the Hudson river and thence extended generally in a northerly direction one and three-tenths miles to lock No. 2; thence northerly five and two-tenths miles to its junction with the Champlain canal from which point of junction the Erie canal extends westerly and the Champlain canal northerly two and twenty-five one-hundredths miles to a point where it crossed the Mohawk river in the pool of the state dam.

Lock No. 1 had a lift of sixteen feet. Lock No. 2 had a lift of about nine and one-half feet. The Champlain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Unger v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. People Ex Rel. Hopkins v. . B'd Sup'rs Kings Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. People Ex Rel. N.Y.C., Etc., R.R. Co. v. . WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. People ex rel. Jordan v. WotherspoonNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Pelo v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Knorr v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API