Legal Opinion
JKC3H8 v. Colton
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 2013No. C071010PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOCH, J.
Factually, this case involves a dispute between neighbors over the use of a road and certain alleged threats, harassment, and interference with property rights arising out of this dispute. Legally, it involves the following issue: Where a plaintiff who has filed a complaint containing causes of action that are based, in part, on protected conduct—and therefore potentially subject to a special motion to strike under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (the anti-SLAPP statute) 1 —subsequently files an amended complaint removing the allegations of.protected conduct as a basis…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Martinez v. Metabolife International., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Contreras v. DowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Dickinson v. Cosby, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Contreras v. Dowling, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016
- Contreras v. DowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Dickinson v. CosbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.