Legal Opinion

State v. McAuliffe

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 3, 2016No. 1102485CR; A156306PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.

In this criminal case, defendant appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal on one count of unlawful use of a weapon with a firearm. ORS 166.220(l)(a); ORS 161.610. Because we conclude that the state presented legally sufficient evidence to support a finding that defendant carried or possessed a shotgun with the intent either to use it to injure another person or to use it to threaten to immediately injure another person, we affirm.

We review the denial of a motion for a judgment of acquittal to determine whether, after viewing the evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Ziska / GarzaOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. DanielsOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. CufaudeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. PiesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Christopher D. HaleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  2. State v. GaribayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. SeversonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API