Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Acme Chair & Metal Crafts Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

A motion to substitute Joseph J. Schmitt as a party to these proceedings and to this appeal in the place of the Acme Company has been made. The objection to such substitution on the part of the Norcor Company, by its receivers and creditors, is that the Acme Company is not a good-faith corporation; that it was illegally organized to enable attorneys to prosecute the case under an arrangement which is “unlawful and savoring of champerty and maintenance;” that the result of the transactions by the organizers of the company is to create a corporation for the practice of law; and that its acts in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blixt v. JanowiakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Norcor Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. BurczykWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Schmitt v. De LaneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  4. Schmitt v. Norcor Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API