Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. National Accident & Health Insurance

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 7, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, C. J.

The plaintiff held an accident policy in the defendant company, during the life of which he met with an accident which disabled him for several weeks. His claim for indemnity having been rejected by the company, he brought this suit therefor. At the close of the evidence below, a verdict was ordered for the defendant, and the plaintiff excepted.

One ground of the defendant’s motion for a verdict was that there was no evidence that a notice of injury was given the company as required by the policy. This ground was much relied upon by the court below, and inasmuch as it presents what seems to us…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bankers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. National Building Ass'n v. QuinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Town of Barnet v. Town of NortonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  4. Uhlman v. Arnholdt & Schaefer Brewing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Best v. German InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Niagara Fire Insurance v. Lowell Trucking Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Vilas v. Estate of WortheimSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  3. Phelps v. HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API